I am looking for some help completing my latest naming convention. I am looking for help with the beginning part of the name, as I want to sort Pokemon by name.
As an example for my latest naming convention idea, I'll use Blissey with Zen Headbutt and Dazzling Gleam, with its total IV being between 33 and 34 (actual total IV, not %): *xA 33+
The * represents that this moveset cannot be improved. This also sorts this Pokemon higher than those that have suboptimal movesets. The first 2 letters (xA) represent Gamepress' ratings for this moveset, for both attacking and defending. The last numbers (33+) represent the Pokemon's total IV, adding in the + if the exact IV cannot be determined.
The above naming convention is useless as of now, as a Yanma with Wing Attack and Aerial Ace ('A' rating for both attacking and defending) would be listed before a Blissey with Zen Headbutt and Dazzling Gleam (xA rating).
Ultimately I would prefer that Pokemon are sorted by how good of an attacker and defender they are. Blissey for example, should show up on top due to being a good defender, regardless of the fact that she is a bad attacker. Likewise, Legendary Pokemon should show up towards the top, for being good attackers.
"*xA 33+" takes up 7 characters in the name, leaving me 5 characters to work with.
My latest idea is to include Gamepress' ratings for base stats.
The thing is, stats are complicated. I don't know how important each stat is. I also don't know which stats are more important when attacking, and when defending. Gamepress' stat ratings are also not equal. Attack is rated out of 180, Defense out of 167, and Stamina out of 63. I suppose this could be fixed by converting each separate rating into equal fractions.
Is there a way that I could use these stat ratings to come up with my own rating for each Pokemon, for attacking and defending? What about if I averaged all 3 ratings, to make my own over all rating for each Pokemon? I do know that factors such as a Pokemon's type, and who they counter are probably more important than their stats. I like the idea of including stat ratings into the name though.
Any thoughts?