GamePress

Should Gym's hyerarchy be changed?

Bigger CP go first!

I think they should change this! Frist to come should be on top, then second to enter should be second on top.

Do you feel this would be more fair?

Asked by 999Vil9998 years 5 months ago
Report

Answers

Make it based on the pokemon's level. I want to see level 40 Metapods on the top of level 10 gyms.

Up
0
Down

by Amu 8 years 5 months ago

hahaha this sounds interesting. But i don't know an apropriate way for pushing the arena up to ten with such "messed up" gyms

Up
0
Down

It would be the same way, but you would have to check all pokemons to know the lowest CP.

Up
0
Down

No.. there should be some kind of reward for being a high-level player with high-level pokemon - i.e. you should be able to kick the living crap out of most gyms, and put your high-level 'mon right there at the top. :)

Up
0
Down

You still can If your are first! And you should be first if you are so good! :-D

And it would give more motivation for lower players to try to conquer Gyms.

Up
0
Down

lower level players can't even take down gyms anyway. all they can do is train friendly gyms, which means pokemon are already in the gym which means they won't be first in.

pokemon level solves the issue of pokemon that have good defending ability but lower CP being put at the bottom of gyms just because of the way cp is calculated, favouring pokemon with higher attack.

e.g. poliwrath, wigglytuff, clefable, slowbro

lower level players already have motivation to level up which would allow them to place their stuff in gyms,and thats because of pokecoins

Up
0
Down

I totally agree that they have to change anything.
In my opinion the players have to work to be the gym leader. When you are putting in ur mon in the gym you are sitting on the lowest slot. But you can battle the mon sitting on the slot above. If you win the battle you are climbing a place in the tower and you can fight again with the mon above. If you won all the battles you are the gym leader.
I think it would make it more competitive. If u want to stay in the gym you have to invest time and go back to the gym. It will also make it more variety what I'll miss the most now.

Is this maybe a realistic system? Input or some changes are welcome for sure!

(Sorry for my english, did my best :-))

Up
0
Down

I would rather see people's avatar's and level at gym and click them and battle a team of 6 they have selected. Blues fight to be top blues, reds fight to be top reds. Not team vs team. I just want 6v6 strategic fights damnit. With a records system win/lost.

If you wanted to be the leader of a particular gym you would have to invest all your good team into that gym.

I don't know if this makes sense I don't want to make a wall of text.

Up
0
Down

What about gym is remain the same(prestige point and cp sorting) but let the gym defenders(10 players) can assign atleast 1 pokemon to 6 pokemon on their slots. So ppl gonna focus on their nearby gym instead of running around the town to place on every gym in that area.

Up
0
Down