GamePress

A case for ZH / EQ as the best Snorlax defensive move?

Given the recent CP bump to Rhydon, he is now my go-to counter for Snorlax. Rhydon has some resistance to Normal moves (Hyper Beam, Body Slam) and is weak against Ground moves (Earthquake).

I understand the relative ease of dodging HB and EQ vs. BS. But I would think that against Rhydon, EQ is at least a better charge move than HB because it will create more damage even if dodged (I think).

Any change of opinion in the community for Snorlax counters after the CP bump and implications for Snorlax' best defensive moveset?

Asked by saoulons8 years 5 months ago
Report

Answers

by Arak2 8 years 5 months ago

I've posted something similiar in past.

But after listening to all the comments I would think Ratings should be
A) Zen + Body still
B) Zen + EQ
B) Zen + HB
C) Lick + Body
D) Lick + EQ
D) Lick + HB

Up
0
Down

This. It's the only thing on the site I don't really agree with.

Up
0
Down

Thanks all. I guess we are splitting hairs a little bit after reading all of the helpful responses ;-)

The above ratings make complete sense to me and no need to argue EQ vs. HB as they both have clear advantages / disadvantages; one could do much worse than a high CP Snorlax with ZH and whatever charge move...

Up
0
Down

EQ - 100 damage x 1.25 SE = 125 damage
HB - 120 damage x 1.25 STAB x 0.8 resist = 120

So it does do more damage, but not by much, and in return you're weaker against Pokemon that don't resist HB.

Also EQs early damage means attackers are more likely to get in a charge move and still dodge the subsequent quick moves while Hyper Beams damage is closer to the end of the cooldown making it harder to fit in a charge move and still dodge, and if you get a full damage quick move that more or less makes up for the 5 damage that EQ has over HB.

You could use the charge move before the HB hits but then you risk taking full damage which isn't worth it, unless your charge move is really fast like Dragon Claw or Body Slam.

Up
0
Down

Yeah the damage window factor is important. With hyper's long chargeup you have to have balls to squeeze in extra attacks. Much easier to squeeze in attacks after the fact knowing a quick move coming next

Up
0
Down

Yeah, now that Rhydon is more popular EQ got more viable but is still not as good overall as Hyper

Why? B/c Hyper doing 1.0x dmg vs. EQ doing 1.25x dmg is about the same dmg, EQ just has 0.8 sec lower cooldown.

So giving up the extra dmg vs. other common attackers is a tough sell to gain a slight advantage vs. Rhydon.

However, I'd say that EQ's value goes up in a gym that already has a couple Lax's with either Hyper or Body Slam - will keep them guessing and mix it up

Up
0
Down

Dmg difference is very minimal, but earthquake is not very effective vs dragonite and thats why it sucks, imo.

Up
0
Down

I agree with EQ being better than HB. I don't know why everyone is fretting over the math of it when anyone but the most basic noob is going to dodge Hyper Beam like 90%+ of the time.

Up
0
Down